<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Don&#039;t Lose Your Day Job &#124; The Recessionist&#039;s Guide To Gaming &#187; who framed roger rabbit 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/tag/who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dontloseyourdayjob.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Excited For &#8216;Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2&#8242;&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2</link>
		<comments>http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scruffy McGhee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob haskins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert zemeckis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who framed roger rabbit 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/?p=3037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/' addthis:title='Are You Excited For &#8216;Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2&#8242;&#8230;? '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>With the original writers of Who Framed Roger Rabbit now at work on a potential sequel, Robert Zemeckis is starting to talk, in very guarded terms, about ideas for the film. Clark Kent says: I&#8217;m not mad at this. What about you guys? Think they&#8217;re crossing a line by making another Roger Rabbit? &#160; VIA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/' addthis:title='Are You Excited For &#8216;Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2&#8242;&#8230;? '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p><a href="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/411P5PR5F3L._SL500_AA300_.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11719" title="411P5PR5F3L._SL500_AA300_" src="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/411P5PR5F3L._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>With the original writers of <em>Who Framed Roger Rabbit</em> now at work on a potential sequel, Robert Zemeckis is starting to talk, in very guarded terms, about ideas for the film.</p>
<p><strong>Clark Kent says:</strong> <em>I&#8217;m not mad at this. What about you guys? Think they&#8217;re crossing a line by making another Roger Rabbit?<span id="more-3037"></span></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/who_framed_roger_rabbit.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11721" title="who_framed_roger_rabbit" src="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/who_framed_roger_rabbit.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><strong>VIA SF:</strong></p>
<p>Given that he’s become a massive proponent of performance capture technology, there have been questions (such as those raised by Brendon) about whether the original film’s blend of drawn animation and live action actors would be augmented by new tech. That seems likely to be the case, as evidenced by current statements from Zemeckis.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/roger4.preview.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11720" title="roger4.preview" src="http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/roger4.preview.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>MTV got the director to talk very briefly about his approach to the film and the core characters. When asked if performance capture tech was part of the reason the movie was finally moving forward, he said:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>That’s true, yeah, although I wouldn’t use if for the cartoon characters, because I think they should stay two-dimensional. That’s their charm. I wouldn’t dimensionalize Roger. And I couldn’t dimensionalize Jessica, even if I wanted to, because she doesn’t have a nose. We don’t want to give her a nose!…All the other characters that they would sort of have fun with would be magnificent in performance capture technology</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Clark Kent says:</strong> <em>I wonder if Kathleen Turner will come back to do the voice work?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/are-you-excited-for-who-framed-roger-rabbit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

